8 Comments
User's avatar
Rainbow Roxy's avatar

It's interesting how you framed this, because I totally get what you're saying about AI being a tool. Thanks for putting it out there so clearly. It's super imporntant people understand it's about augmenting human creativty, not replacing it. This article totally nails that distinction.

1106Design's avatar

Thanks for taking the time to comment. We appreciate it!

Neural Foundry's avatar

The fram of AI as a research tool rather than a creativity replacement is the right aproach. Using it for keyword optimization and metadata testing can save so much time on the marketing side, which honestly takes away from actual writing for most indie authors.

1106Design's avatar

Thanks for taking the time to comment. We really appreciate it!

Neural Foundry's avatar

Great stuff, subscribed!

1106Design's avatar

Thank you!

Anne Marie Kenny's avatar

This is worrisome. I’d rather 1106 Design advocate for preserving the art of human beings writing creatively, and imagining their own unique storylines and plots.

We writers need publishing advocates that help us ensure human writing is authentic and differentiated from artificially constructed books. There should exist a stamp of authenticity on books written with pure human endeavor, skill, creativity, and imagination, and without AI interference.

Anne Marie Kenny

1106Design's avatar

We did, Anne Marie. Please note all the places we mentioned that AI is not a substitute for human creativity.

Like a library, AI is best used as a research tool, to open up avenues for authors to explore and develop in their own unique ways.

Terrible, AI-generated writing is instantly recognizable. Like fakery in any business, buyers rarely reward it.